Who owns the UGC you make?
It depends on the platform, and the answer is usually in a document nobody reads. One major platform has you irrevocably assign your copyright to the brand. Another says you keep it outright. A third never says. The difference is not a technicality — it decides whether you can ever use your own video again.
Three things that get confused
Most arguments about this are really three separate questions wearing the same coat.
- Ownership — who holds the copyright. The owner can do anything with the work and can stop anyone else doing anything with it.
- Usage rights — what the brand is allowed to do with it, without owning it. Usually described by where it may run, for how long, and in which markets.
- Exclusivity — whether you may make something similar for anyone else, and for how long. This one is separate from both of the others and is the one most often missed.
A brief can leave you owning the copyright while still preventing you from posting the video on your own account, and that is not a contradiction. Read for all three.
What the platforms actually say
These are quotes from each company's own creator terms, checked in October 2026. Terms change, so check the source before relying on any of it.
Rights transfer to the brand
Billo's creator terms say you “irrevocably assign and transfer to the Brand all rights, title, and interest in and to any Intellectual Property Rights in the Deliverables worldwide”. That is the strongest version: once the video is accepted, it is not yours. You cannot put it in a portfolio without permission, you cannot reuse the footage, and you cannot object to how it is edited. Billo separately keeps its own licence to use the work for operating and marketing the platform.
This is not unusual in commissioned video and it is not hidden — it is stated plainly in the terms. It is also priced in: a fee that buys the copyright outright should be larger than one that buys a licence, which is why the next section matters.
You keep it
Whop's Content Rewards terms say the opposite: “Participant shall own all rights throughout the universe… in and to the content that Participant produces”. Read the sentence after it too, because the licence that comes with it is broad — a “worldwide, royalty-free, sublicensable, irrevocable, perpetual right and license” for the platform and the brand to use, edit and distribute the work. You own it; they can still do almost anything with it, forever.
That combination is common and is worth understanding rather than celebrating. Owning the copyright protects you from being stopped from using your own work. It does not restrict what the other side does with their licence.
It is not stated
Insense's pages describe what the brand gets — “full digital usage rights to any content that you commission… reuse any content you receive for future ads, website content, or as you see fit” — without saying who owns it, and without stating a duration. JoinBrands and Vyro do not publish an ownership position on their creator pages at all.
Silence is not neutral. If the terms do not say, the answer comes from the specific agreement you accepted when you applied, which may be a brief rather than a published document. Ask before filming, in writing.
Where OVERCLIP stands
Our Terms say: “You retain ownership of the content you create.” The licence we take is narrow and is written out — a non-exclusive, worldwide, royalty-free licence to access, display, reference and use the links, metrics and non-confidential campaign-related materials you submit, for operating and promoting the service. That is about showing your clip in a dashboard and counting its views, not about re-cutting your video into an advert.
One thing to be straight about: what a brand may do with a video is set by the individual campaign brief, not by that clause. Read the brief for usage, duration and exclusivity the same way you would anywhere else. Our terms tell you who owns the work; they do not negotiate your usage terms for you.
What to check before you film
- Does it say “assign” or “licence”? Assign means transfer of ownership. Licence means permission. One word, completely different deal.
- Is the licence perpetual? “Perpetual” and “irrevocable” mean you cannot take it back later, even if the relationship ends badly.
- Is it sublicensable? If yes, the brand can pass the right on to somebody you have never heard of, including an agency or another platform.
- Paid ads, or organic only? A video a brand may run as a paid advert for twelve months in every market is a fundamentally different product from one they post once. If the brief does not say, ask before quoting.
- Can you show it? Portfolio use is the first thing creators lose and the last thing they think to ask about. Get it in writing if the work matters to you.
- Is there exclusivity? A clause stopping you from making anything similar for a competitor has a real cost, especially in a narrow niche.
Common questions
If I keep the copyright, can I post the video myself?
Usually yes, but not always — some briefs restrict where the footage may appear even when ownership stays with you, and a few include exclusivity that covers your own channels for a period. Ownership and permission to post are different questions.
Can a brand edit my video without asking?
If the licence includes the right to edit or modify, yes. Most do. If seeing your work re-cut would bother you, that is a clause to read rather than a surprise to have later.
What if I already signed something that assigns the rights?
Then the rights are assigned. An assignment is not undone by regretting it, and this is not legal advice — if a specific deal matters enough, it is worth a lawyer rather than an article. The useful move is to read the next one before signing it.
Does any of this change what I am paid?
It should. Buying a copyright outright is worth more than buying a licence to post once, and paid-ads usage is worth more than organic. If the brief asks for broad rights at a rate set for narrow ones, that is the thing to negotiate — or to decline.
Where do I find the terms?
The creator terms, not the brand-facing marketing pages. On most platforms they are linked from the signup flow and almost nowhere else. Search the document for “assign”, “licence”, “perpetual” and “exclusive” and you will have most of the answer in two minutes.
The short version
Ownership, usage and exclusivity are three different things, and a platform can be generous on one and severe on another. Billo transfers the copyright; Whop leaves it with you alongside a perpetual licence; Insense, JoinBrands and Vyro do not publish a position. Ours says you keep what you make.
Read next: how UGC pay actually works, or the sourced comparisons of OVERCLIP and Billo and OVERCLIP and Whop Content Rewards, where these quotes sit next to the rest of each platform's terms.
Get notified when new UGC campaigns open
One email when a campaign that fits UGC creators goes live. No other mail, and you can unsubscribe from any of them.